15 April 2006

AND YOU KNOW IT'S GOING TO BE... ALRIGHT (NOT!)

I know this is John telling the Maoists to get lost, and so it's not particularly relevant in itself. But it's been such a long time that anyone actually discussed the subject in public, at all... thanks to Gregory for finding this in the archives...

..>

14 April 2006

JUST PLANTING TREES ALONE WON'T DO MUCH

thanks to The Fall of Humanity for noticing this one. The study appears to show that, if you're going to plant trees to combat global warming, you need to feed them carefully... the headline seems rather pessimistic...
NEW NEIL YOUNG ALBUM

Gregory pointed this out...read here... also in Harp magazine, and Jambase and Editor and Publisher



Neil Young's political instincts have been fairly mainstream (when heard in an American context -- keeping in mind that Neil's Canadian). Neil hasn't always said "liberal" stuff, keeping in mind (as the Editor and Publisher article pointed out) several pro-Reagan comments he made during the '80s. Neil also wrote a song called "Let's Roll" on an album called Are You Passionate? with lyrics that are hard to stomach. Neil is more of a weathervane for the political wind than anything else. So when he puts out a song titled "Impeach the President," I suppose that says something about the current situation.
EVEN THE CAPITALISTS ARE FEELING THE HEAT THESE DAYS



Here is how the investor class sees things these days... kind of grim... meanwhile, the slightly-less-self-centered capitalists appear to be railing around this "spare the taxpayer, spur the economy, save the planet" mantram...Here's what they tell themselves:
''Socialism collapsed because it did not allow the market to tell the economic truth,'' Dahle said. ''Capitalism may collapse because it does not allow the market to tell the ecological truth.'
"Socialism" collapsed because it was really only state capitalism, and state capitalism died because, while it was drifting into debtor-nation status, Gorbachev handed the Soviet Union over to a cabal of Thatcherists. Selling state capitalism using the propaganda of socialism did wonders for Russia, but it could only work for so long.

BTW, "the market" has no "economic truth." Practically everything I've read in economics looks for a short dismissal of the questions of "who benefits? who loses? and in what way?" Phrases such as "good for the economy" are meaningless -- "good for the investor class" might mean something, whereas "good for the economy" can mean "bad for the working person," especially when used to describe a jobless recovery. And then "good for the economy" can mean "bad for the environment," as it does in China, which means that eventually "good for the economy" will bite everyone on the butt.

(Furthermore, "the market" is itself a product of manipulation -- prices, production, companies, etc. are all products of manipulation, so "market manipulation" is a redundancy.)

The economist assumes that "more money" is good for you -- but it really isn't good for you if you spend it in a way that is bad for you, for instance if you use your money endangering your health with greasy food or recreational drugs or fast cars. Oh yeah -- the owning class will only buy into "green capitalism" insofar as it provides a "greenwash" cover for their real profit-making activities, which involve jettisoning costs onto nature (i.e. trash, pollution) and the consumer (i.e. public subsidy) while hoarding profits for themselves. The accounting ledger (under conditions of capitalist competition) demands no less.

My point is this: raising environmental taxes will be tolerated only insofar as polluting industries can be outsourced elsewhere. No self-respecting German business would want to pollute in Germany, when it's cheaper to pollute in Indonesia, anyway. So raise pollution taxes in Germany -- it will only hurry capitalists who are out the door anyway. "Environmentalists" of this stripe really need to stop pretending that "national economies" still exist in any meaningful way, since it doesn't fool anyone. We know what globalization is.

When economists start measuring the optimal environment to be produced by production itself, that's when we can start listening to them. Otherwise we can assume that economic reason is an unhealthy form of reason.

13 April 2006

POLL: AMERICAN CONSCIOUSNESS NOT YET INTERNATIONALIZED

This headline graced the LA Times front page today.





Most Back Tighter Border and a Guest-Worker Plan


How about a poll that asked these questions?

1. Should Mexicans be legally allowed to enter that 40 percent of Mexico (i.e. California, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Texas) that the US stole from Mexico?

2. Should the US take any responsibility for the fact that its well-subsidized agribusiness interests drove Mexico's corn farmers out of business under NAFTA, thus bringing them to a desire to make money here?

3. Would you terribly mind the economic downturn that would occur after all the "illegal aliens" are sent home, taking their labor with them?

4. Would you like to pay more for products that are cheap now because they are made with the cheap labor of illegals?

5. If the US dollar were to lose 99.9 percent of its value tomorrow, wiping out the American economy, would you feel good about entering a low-wage "guest worker" program in Canada to feed your family?

6. If you knew someone in a country more prosperous than yours (as do half of all Mexicans), would you want to live there?

7. If global capital can move from one country to the next without facing a border wall, armed guards, and immigration authorities, why should working people have to face these things?




Lesson to be learned: the LA Times poll seems to indicate that the US is still hypnotized by the ideology of American exceptionalism, which tells them that the problems faced elsewhere by the workers of the rest of the world are something they don't have to worry about, because the US is an "exceptional" nation. This ideology is fed by US foreign policy efforts to keep the rest of the world down. Perhaps American exceptionalism will be shattered by a collapse in the value of the US Dollar at some future point.


think creatively

12 April 2006

CLIMATE CHANGE SHATTERING MARINE FOOD CHAIN

see here... just collect these pieces and use them for an overall assessment of the damage done by the current economic system...

11 April 2006

PRETTY PICTURE



A FISH STORY

Counterpunch reports today that the tragedy of the commons has hit the world's oceans, with the end-result that global fish populations are disappearing...Mother Jones chimes in...

10 April 2006

SNL SKIT

from Gregory via Beau...



Get this video and more at MySpace.com

NOW THAT'LL TEACH ANTHONY SOLTERO A LESSON

Tell 'im he'll get three years in jail for exercising his legally protected free-speech rights! Oh, never mind. From the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin.



Anthony Soltero


meanwhile the rallies just grow and grow....

SEE, GANG? PROTEST WORKS!

First of all, from the news in France you can see what can be done -- now get out there!

09 April 2006

DEBATE ON MARX FINALLY MAKES IT TO THE GUARDIAN

You can read about it here...

DAVE LINDORFF AGREES WITH ME

See here... Lindorff, or Jason Leopold, or someone, needs to bring up the question I brought up in yesterday's blog: If the information that "Valerie Plame is a CIA agent" is deemed by the President to not be "classified information," how is that not a violation of the law that decrees the identity of CIA agents to be classified information?
GREENPEACE'S CAMPAIGN AGAINST MCDONALDS: A FOOTNOTE

Thanks to Gregory for pointing this out. One amusing aspect of this article is the notion of national identity for these corporations, which apparently even the radicals hold. "Greenpeace said three US commodities giants -- Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland and Bunge -- control 60 percent of soya production in Brazil." Just precisely how are these "commodity giants" attached to the US if (among many other things) they control 60 percent of Brazil's soya production? Isn't it time we admitted to global rulership by a transnational capitalist class?
GET READY FOR INCREASED CANCER RATES

They'll use nukes... they've got an alibi, of course, but remember their philosophy:
In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire that the White House didn't like about Bush's former communications director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser to Bush. He expressed the White House's displeasure, and then he told me something that at the time I didn't fully comprehend -- but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush presidency.

The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,'' he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.''
Meanwhile, the President and his party have hit new lows in the polls...so they might be desperate...